No, unfortunately. But I have made differently.
In xkb.c :
#ifdef HAVE_X11_EXTENSIONS_XKB_H
#include <X11/XKBlib.h>
#endif
....
....
#ifdef HAVE_X11_EXTENSIONS_XKB_H
static XkbDescPtr us_kb_map;
#endif
and next step:
$ ./configure
$ make instal clean
... succesfull..o.k.
?any troubles in HAVE_X11_EXTENSIONS_XKB_H
when ./configure working i see in output:
...
checking X11/Xlib.h usability... no
checking X11/Xlib.h presence... no
checking for X11/Xlib.h... no
checking X11/extensions/XKB.h usability... no
checking X11/extensions/XKB.h presence... no
checking for X11/extensions/XKB.h... no
...
And then this scheme does not work.
And us_kb_map really "undeclared" :(
Where I can read through about HAVE_X11_EXTENSIONS_XKB_H? How it will be involved?
sorry not correct post :(
Probably, it is time to me to go to sleep
Haha, spoiler markup found.
he... How it is correct post comments in a code? Similar they were "eaten" with a script of a forum.
Attaching it is one way, yeah.
Alternately stick a tab or four spaces in front of each line. (most text editors have an "indent" command... or do a sed s/^/ / if you have a 'nix system handy)
>>553
Whoops, should've been four spaces in there... HTML ate them. Foiled again!
>>548 I understand well enough. Added to CVS.
I'll update the builds later today; when they update, please download and let us know if they will compile cleanly for you.
Compilation has passed successfully! Thanks! Also I corrected symbolical references:
INSTALL
/usr/share/automake-1.9/INSTALL -> /usr/local/share/automake-1.4/INSTALL
(Strange. In automake 1.9 it was not possible to find INSTALL it was necessary to use the old version)
config.guess
/usr/share/automake-1.9/config.guess -> /usr/local/share/automake-1.9/config.guess
..etc (config.sub, depcomp, install-sh, missing) add "../local/.."
Those files really shouldn't be links anyway. That's a debianism.